Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 07:55:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C70CCDA1B707B26128FB7C9C8F8177CEFB4F204B732A07BCF1D068A93A2E7C7B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The impact analysis that forms the core of this post is disputed by Open Source Intelligence experts, who claim it only relevant if the projectile had a natural, parabolic curve. In a misfired hypothesis, impact analysis is not relevant for determining origin. https://twitter.com/Nrg8000/status/1715498665669005582

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715600044173545763
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C70CCDA1B707B26128FB7C9C8F8177CEFB4F204B732A07BCF1D068A93A2E7C7B
  • createdAtMillis - 1697874917240
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715600044173545763C70CCDA1B707B26128FB7C9C8F8177CEFB4F204B732A07BCF1D068A93A2E7C7B