Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 09:46:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FFD10BAC71A02719984AF37227CDF451A57AF98D64040F9716E4EE45D52167E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

El artículo mismo menciona textualmente: "bajó una posición respecto al año anterior." Lo que indica un retroceso. Así mismo es importante aclarar que Ecopetrol ha tenido pérdidas en el último Año. https://www.bloomberglinea.com/latinoamerica/colombia/utilidades-de-ecopetrol-cayeron-61-en-segundo-trimestre-y-vendio-22-menos/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1715592856792940986
participantId -
raterParticipantId - FFD10BAC71A02719984AF37227CDF451A57AF98D64040F9716E4EE45D52167E5
createdAtMillis - 1697881591851
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1715592856792940986FFD10BAC71A02719984AF37227CDF451A57AF98D64040F9716E4EE45D52167E5