Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 05:14:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 453DF97B4F3E06CD4105F071D0C67DEA5CE370CFF2BF6B415D9AF81B582B7149
Participant Details

Original Note:

El artículo mismo menciona textualmente: "bajó una posición respecto al año anterior." Lo que indica un retroceso. Así mismo es importante aclarar que Ecopetrol ha tenido pérdidas en el último Año. https://www.bloomberglinea.com/latinoamerica/colombia/utilidades-de-ecopetrol-cayeron-61-en-segundo-trimestre-y-vendio-22-menos/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1715592856792940986
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 453DF97B4F3E06CD4105F071D0C67DEA5CE370CFF2BF6B415D9AF81B582B7149
createdAtMillis - 1697865279362
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1715592856792940986453DF97B4F3E06CD4105F071D0C67DEA5CE370CFF2BF6B415D9AF81B582B7149