Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 14:48:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3F234C6E050E09633AE4E53F7F11D5BA850C93CB98435F4A46DDEBB8CF134AF8
Participant Details

Original Note:

El artículo mismo menciona textualmente: "bajó una posición respecto al año anterior." Lo que indica un retroceso. Así mismo es importante aclarar que Ecopetrol ha tenido pérdidas en el último Año. https://www.bloomberglinea.com/latinoamerica/colombia/utilidades-de-ecopetrol-cayeron-61-en-segundo-trimestre-y-vendio-22-menos/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1715592856792940986
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 3F234C6E050E09633AE4E53F7F11D5BA850C93CB98435F4A46DDEBB8CF134AF8
createdAtMillis - 1697899731466
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17155928567929409863F234C6E050E09633AE4E53F7F11D5BA850C93CB98435F4A46DDEBB8CF134AF8