Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 13:23:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A7C3B502A13F55825D950D4A787B99F077B9D1E0169722FB41843B68B9F4AFD6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nnn, independent university-based research agency contradicts the information provided in attached note by WSJ. It would be advisable not to utilize this note as a basis for a counterargument since there has been no fact finding mission. https://x.com/forensicarchi/status/1715422493274427414?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715587681550541166
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A7C3B502A13F55825D950D4A787B99F077B9D1E0169722FB41843B68B9F4AFD6
  • createdAtMillis - 1697894625970
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715587681550541166A7C3B502A13F55825D950D4A787B99F077B9D1E0169722FB41843B68B9F4AFD6