Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 19:02:13 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6242DE14FB29A55156D14D20925225FB6BE7F29415C6CF63D09398A2E525F288
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nnn, independent university-based research agency contradicts the information provided in attached note by WSJ. It would be advisable not to utilize this note as a basis for a counterargument since there has been no fact finding mission. https://x.com/forensicarchi/status/1715422493274427414?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715587681550541166
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6242DE14FB29A55156D14D20925225FB6BE7F29415C6CF63D09398A2E525F288
  • createdAtMillis - 1697914933672
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17155876815505411666242DE14FB29A55156D14D20925225FB6BE7F29415C6CF63D09398A2E525F288