Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 15:49:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2B1D3FBC9CB3BF165E3A124F432226F994B7AF07500B993EBF2AAC3D58E8A4CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nnn, independent university-based research agency contradicts the information provided in attached note by WSJ. It would be advisable not to utilize this note as a basis for a counterargument since there has been no fact finding mission. https://x.com/forensicarchi/status/1715422493274427414?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715587681550541166
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2B1D3FBC9CB3BF165E3A124F432226F994B7AF07500B993EBF2AAC3D58E8A4CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1697903381726
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17155876815505411662B1D3FBC9CB3BF165E3A124F432226F994B7AF07500B993EBF2AAC3D58E8A4CA