Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-22 10:48:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2BA018516EC332E28680E258FF3B15433CF949667D1BD3BF234A69D6295B5957
Participant Details

Original Note:

RCTs conducted at the same period overall point towards no improved outcomes with HCQ. The added value of this study, using an observational approach, knowingly defective data, and a broken methodology is questionable. https://pubpeer.com/publications/08C7F120290F73A19DE04926217C58#1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715494273825542645
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2BA018516EC332E28680E258FF3B15433CF949667D1BD3BF234A69D6295B5957
  • createdAtMillis - 1697971686812
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17154942738255426452BA018516EC332E28680E258FF3B15433CF949667D1BD3BF234A69D6295B5957