Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 23:27:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E5679D2BE99235A82BF31AA861ADC9A80170A65BA460702FE65DA7B0E1A4943
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. No matter what Scott Ritter has been convicted of or what opinions you have on him, the tweet does not express any factually incorrect claims. Further discussion should be held in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715447075481997661
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E5679D2BE99235A82BF31AA861ADC9A80170A65BA460702FE65DA7B0E1A4943
  • createdAtMillis - 1698276423700
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17154470754819976612E5679D2BE99235A82BF31AA861ADC9A80170A65BA460702FE65DA7B0E1A4943