Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-10 02:25:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E359C686DC584E08B38153768796BB56A22547E03C3763353B7E295D2CC31389
Participant Details

Original Note:

The above note is a personal opinion as is the op's post so NNN. The link is ONLY the indictment from 1/23 and the conclusion says:This court shall not substitute for the judgment of a jury its own judgment as to whether the reasonable listener or reader would have interpreted Mr

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715412213349961855
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E359C686DC584E08B38153768796BB56A22547E03C3763353B7E295D2CC31389
  • createdAtMillis - 1699583132366
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715412213349961855E359C686DC584E08B38153768796BB56A22547E03C3763353B7E295D2CC31389