Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 09:41:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 72DBB5DD745E7A73CF7F1A400BD55FA2E6BC31B2D9537157320AEA18900A4C57
Participant Details

Original Note:

The above note is a personal opinion as is the op's post so NNN. The link is ONLY the indictment from 1/23 and the conclusion says:This court shall not substitute for the judgment of a jury its own judgment as to whether the reasonable listener or reader would have interpreted Mr

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715412213349961855
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 72DBB5DD745E7A73CF7F1A400BD55FA2E6BC31B2D9537157320AEA18900A4C57
  • createdAtMillis - 1697881267358
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171541221334996185572DBB5DD745E7A73CF7F1A400BD55FA2E6BC31B2D9537157320AEA18900A4C57