Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-22 11:12:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2D6F665E8EA81310B87C5312D72AE0119411F502B7C2FB9E711D4CBB5FE38B3E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The above note is a personal opinion as is the op's post so NNN. The link is ONLY the indictment from 1/23 and the conclusion says:This court shall not substitute for the judgment of a jury its own judgment as to whether the reasonable listener or reader would have interpreted Mr

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715412213349961855
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2D6F665E8EA81310B87C5312D72AE0119411F502B7C2FB9E711D4CBB5FE38B3E
  • createdAtMillis - 1697973126682
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17154122133499618552D6F665E8EA81310B87C5312D72AE0119411F502B7C2FB9E711D4CBB5FE38B3E