Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-20 11:02:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF71C817E9266F447476D3666794ABDF3DBC7F326F3797667BECF68FAE85EB3F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. No risk of misleading anyone. The tone is unambiguously flippant, and it is factually correct as far as it goes. If you really think it's necessary to argue back, the replies are there for you.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715315660690018499
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF71C817E9266F447476D3666794ABDF3DBC7F326F3797667BECF68FAE85EB3F
  • createdAtMillis - 1697799740473
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715315660690018499BF71C817E9266F447476D3666794ABDF3DBC7F326F3797667BECF68FAE85EB3F