Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-20 10:40:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8C18CEB065EBD8532653F2E82A54F6ECCE316EE16F3B69B0DC72019F674EC3E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. No risk of misleading anyone. The tone is unambiguously flippant, and it is factually correct as far as it goes. If you really think it's necessary to argue back, the replies are there for you.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715315660690018499
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8C18CEB065EBD8532653F2E82A54F6ECCE316EE16F3B69B0DC72019F674EC3E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1697798434041
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17153156606900184998C18CEB065EBD8532653F2E82A54F6ECCE316EE16F3B69B0DC72019F674EC3E3