Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 19:30:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 80F22E64B18F3C2D86387131C50DA6031FB6052E9CC857AD4430B96F3F476282
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. No risk of misleading anyone. The tone is unambiguously flippant, and it is factually correct as far as it goes. If you really think it's necessary to argue back, the replies are there for you.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715315660690018499
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 80F22E64B18F3C2D86387131C50DA6031FB6052E9CC857AD4430B96F3F476282
  • createdAtMillis - 1697916649143
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171531566069001849980F22E64B18F3C2D86387131C50DA6031FB6052E9CC857AD4430B96F3F476282