Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-20 13:20:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47A509B0C6A693163AFD558BFF476E43F388E94EDC0DAE2F0D6BFBB64DADD4D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. No risk of misleading anyone. The tone is unambiguously flippant, and it is factually correct as far as it goes. If you really think it's necessary to argue back, the replies are there for you.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715315660690018499
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 47A509B0C6A693163AFD558BFF476E43F388E94EDC0DAE2F0D6BFBB64DADD4D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1697808013507
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171531566069001849947A509B0C6A693163AFD558BFF476E43F388E94EDC0DAE2F0D6BFBB64DADD4D0