Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-20 13:41:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 075D5237EC0C8A66563FD53DE069B6F3EE2398F8AE86E8E8053C8D4303E5B691
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. No risk of misleading anyone. The tone is unambiguously flippant, and it is factually correct as far as it goes. If you really think it's necessary to argue back, the replies are there for you.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715315660690018499
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 075D5237EC0C8A66563FD53DE069B6F3EE2398F8AE86E8E8053C8D4303E5B691
  • createdAtMillis - 1697809279830
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715315660690018499075D5237EC0C8A66563FD53DE069B6F3EE2398F8AE86E8E8053C8D4303E5B691