Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-20 09:23:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0203F81CB73D49C67D6880FC136620B549A7C11B8A1359A760F353F414D8C5EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'image concernée est générée par Intelligence Artificielle. Libération a répondu aux accusations dans une tribune en déclarant qu'il aurait été effectivement préférable de signaler le fait que ce soit une image fausse pour éviter les confusions. https://www.liberation.fr/checknews/libe-sest-il-rendu-coupable-dune-fake-news-en-publiant-la-vraie-photo-dun-homme-brandissant-une-image-generee-par-ia-20231019_SA45AGWDRNAV5OFSHO2XEHCQ2M/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1715256125325447200
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0203F81CB73D49C67D6880FC136620B549A7C11B8A1359A760F353F414D8C5EB
createdAtMillis - 1697793823589
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17152561253254472000203F81CB73D49C67D6880FC136620B549A7C11B8A1359A760F353F414D8C5EB