Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 23:54:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60910E20C156A2B43EE0C9E5FF16B576CEECB327B1D67C563087D68F3E9D51F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes Not Needed Notes are supposed to be for posts that might be misleading. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/about/introduction An approval rating of 400% is an obvious mistake that does not merit further explanation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715059987150430355
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 60910E20C156A2B43EE0C9E5FF16B576CEECB327B1D67C563087D68F3E9D51F9
  • createdAtMillis - 1697759664520
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171505998715043035560910E20C156A2B43EE0C9E5FF16B576CEECB327B1D67C563087D68F3E9D51F9