Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-20 08:40:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DAC684CC3D096921122B3F02233E408E53654465EB7B724D4FD43F0E2E22B61F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This analysis is partial and takes into exam only a limited number of sources compared to those available online, such as other footage and photographs. Like other analyses, it fails to show the "smoking gun." However, it cannot be considered misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715025152759717976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DAC684CC3D096921122B3F02233E408E53654465EB7B724D4FD43F0E2E22B61F
  • createdAtMillis - 1697791252455
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715025152759717976DAC684CC3D096921122B3F02233E408E53654465EB7B724D4FD43F0E2E22B61F