Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-20 20:55:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1FE695356ECAD49D346EC8B6CDD570BC4AEE16D59B748F112B5FEC94FDACAE56
Participant Details

Original Note:

This analysis is partial and takes into exam only a limited number of sources compared to those available online, such as other footage and photographs. Like other analyses, it fails to show the "smoking gun." However, it cannot be considered misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715025152759717976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1FE695356ECAD49D346EC8B6CDD570BC4AEE16D59B748F112B5FEC94FDACAE56
  • createdAtMillis - 1697835315439
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17150251527597179761FE695356ECAD49D346EC8B6CDD570BC4AEE16D59B748F112B5FEC94FDACAE56