Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-20 13:19:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 11691B6E60A3A488F332DD35C0E384AC5C894F035C3C8757E0C663D22452E2A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

This analysis is partial and takes into exam only a limited number of sources compared to those available online, such as other footage and photographs. Like other analyses, it fails to show the "smoking gun." However, it cannot be considered misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715025152759717976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 11691B6E60A3A488F332DD35C0E384AC5C894F035C3C8757E0C663D22452E2A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1697807986624
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171502515275971797611691B6E60A3A488F332DD35C0E384AC5C894F035C3C8757E0C663D22452E2A5