Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 16:28:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E2C0FDF2F0D5210C5E143A5C5A09E4FAEB3AEB6EC872596D2858EAC4751E588
Participant Details

Original Note:

This analysis is partial and takes into exam only a limited number of sources compared to those available online, such as other footage and photographs. Like other analyses, it fails to show the "smoking gun." However, it cannot be considered misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715025152759717976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E2C0FDF2F0D5210C5E143A5C5A09E4FAEB3AEB6EC872596D2858EAC4751E588
  • createdAtMillis - 1697732939983
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17150251527597179760E2C0FDF2F0D5210C5E143A5C5A09E4FAEB3AEB6EC872596D2858EAC4751E588