Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-20 10:26:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 06690C298EC5EC8AE505F1FE9D27FE9DC4E7D8EDB1D2620F8C6AC524D333359D
Participant Details

Original Note:

This analysis is partial and takes into exam only a limited number of sources compared to those available online, such as other footage and photographs. Like other analyses, it fails to show the "smoking gun." However, it cannot be considered misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715025152759717976
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 06690C298EC5EC8AE505F1FE9D27FE9DC4E7D8EDB1D2620F8C6AC524D333359D
  • createdAtMillis - 1697797596863
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171502515275971797606690C298EC5EC8AE505F1FE9D27FE9DC4E7D8EDB1D2620F8C6AC524D333359D