Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 19:34:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A5C14FE4D1290EA18D723ACFDFC306D6685C55556189F141A37FEFBCA9D9377
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The point about self ID is a personal opinion, and the opening statement is correct - the judge in this case said the following in summing up: “would an 11 year old girl have willingly entered your car had you presented as a man? The answer is that obviously she would not” https://judiciary.scot/home/sentences-judgments/sentences-and-opinions/2023/10/18/hma-v-andrew-miller

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714955879642980400
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A5C14FE4D1290EA18D723ACFDFC306D6685C55556189F141A37FEFBCA9D9377
  • createdAtMillis - 1697744082813
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17149558796429804004A5C14FE4D1290EA18D723ACFDFC306D6685C55556189F141A37FEFBCA9D9377