Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 09:40:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 546C493B208394255F21F19741C320FC003888DE8B005BF565692C2AF00A2F9C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original article makes no mention of the word "wokeness" nor is that specific claim stated by Victoria's secret. It specifies a focuses on sexiness that can be inclusive. The original article is from Businesses of Fashion, republished to CNN: https://www.cnn.com/style/why-victorias-secret-is-bringing-sexy-back-bof/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714934937164636550
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 546C493B208394255F21F19741C320FC003888DE8B005BF565692C2AF00A2F9C
  • createdAtMillis - 1697708443763
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714934937164636550546C493B208394255F21F19741C320FC003888DE8B005BF565692C2AF00A2F9C