Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 12:09:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 24D11217B065476E118235A406756CE3B95092F7757606342A3BC8A6E435675E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original article makes no mention of the word "wokeness" nor is that specific claim stated by Victoria's secret. It specifies a focuses on sexiness that can be inclusive. The original article is from Businesses of Fashion, republished to CNN: https://www.cnn.com/style/why-victorias-secret-is-bringing-sexy-back-bof/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714934937164636550
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 24D11217B065476E118235A406756CE3B95092F7757606342A3BC8A6E435675E
  • createdAtMillis - 1697717356502
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171493493716463655024D11217B065476E118235A406756CE3B95092F7757606342A3BC8A6E435675E