Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-22 00:34:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 876631A3DC6773A05A6EBC023AEF8A3E4E43B222BAF2D09676A50B5968DC0D0D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Auch wenn diese „Studie“ nur finanziert wurde, so wurde sie damit unterstützt. Jegliche andere Darstellung ist Irreführung. Faeser ist somit direkt verantwortlich.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714928998751301727
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 876631A3DC6773A05A6EBC023AEF8A3E4E43B222BAF2D09676A50B5968DC0D0D
  • createdAtMillis - 1697934842969
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714928998751301727876631A3DC6773A05A6EBC023AEF8A3E4E43B222BAF2D09676A50B5968DC0D0D