Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 13:15:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF71C817E9266F447476D3666794ABDF3DBC7F326F3797667BECF68FAE85EB3F
Participant Details

Original Note:

As compelling as the analysis sounds, it seems this gentleman is merely expressing his opinion and his personal analysis. Therefore it shouldn’t be taken as fact. Once an investigation has been concluded, we will know more details as to who is to blame. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/opinion

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714914341407830357
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF71C817E9266F447476D3666794ABDF3DBC7F326F3797667BECF68FAE85EB3F
  • createdAtMillis - 1697721354780
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1714914341407830357BF71C817E9266F447476D3666794ABDF3DBC7F326F3797667BECF68FAE85EB3F