Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 23:51:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C34AFCF66F21761A1A8116A4308579CE16EE54DF399F1A98EAABFE77CE3D942
Participant Details

Original Note:

This call has been deemed “not credible” by experts, according to Channel 4. Independent journalists have determined that there were flagrant errors with “language, accent, dialect, syntax & tone”, suggesting that this recording is “an obvious fabrication”. Source: https://www.channel4.com/news/who-was-behind-the-gaza-hospital-blast-visual-investigation (at 3:00)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714856678875689407
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C34AFCF66F21761A1A8116A4308579CE16EE54DF399F1A98EAABFE77CE3D942
  • createdAtMillis - 1697759518520
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17148566788756894070C34AFCF66F21761A1A8116A4308579CE16EE54DF399F1A98EAABFE77CE3D942