Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 05:03:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B4B6EF8589A51E00545F7B0E84409895441B372431500EA5C9F305AC8E340E2
Participant Details

Original Note:

This call has been deemed “not credible” by experts, according to Channel 4. Independent journalists have determined that there were flagrant errors with “language, accent, dialect, syntax & tone”, suggesting that this recording is “an obvious fabrication”. Source: https://www.channel4.com/news/who-was-behind-the-gaza-hospital-blast-visual-investigation (at 3:00)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714856138942923183
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B4B6EF8589A51E00545F7B0E84409895441B372431500EA5C9F305AC8E340E2
  • createdAtMillis - 1697691817522
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17148561389429231831B4B6EF8589A51E00545F7B0E84409895441B372431500EA5C9F305AC8E340E2