Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 08:34:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0B9CDD9403669F9453F914DB5F76D2B3A9FB90629158E41C031E9E2963C3F05
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim has been fact-checked as false (AAP) and rejected by leading polling experts. Electorate-wide results give no indication of how Indigenous people voted, as they are still a minority in those electorates; booth-level data in majority-Indigenous areas is more useful. https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/experts-skewer-indigenous-vote-claim/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714770012811272205
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0B9CDD9403669F9453F914DB5F76D2B3A9FB90629158E41C031E9E2963C3F05
  • createdAtMillis - 1697704496519
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714770012811272205E0B9CDD9403669F9453F914DB5F76D2B3A9FB90629158E41C031E9E2963C3F05