Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 11:43:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 121E8053ED0D343AD0D51FD856CDD4DF2B5CFAF738EAF0F76C12CCB8015E18B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim has been fact-checked as false (AAP) and rejected by leading polling experts. Electorate-wide results give no indication of how Indigenous people voted, as they are still a minority in those electorates; booth-level data in majority-Indigenous areas is more useful. https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/experts-skewer-indigenous-vote-claim/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714770012811272205
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 121E8053ED0D343AD0D51FD856CDD4DF2B5CFAF738EAF0F76C12CCB8015E18B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1697715833591
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714770012811272205121E8053ED0D343AD0D51FD856CDD4DF2B5CFAF738EAF0F76C12CCB8015E18B0