Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-06 00:38:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2BE3D28A19E47F0FC3E2BC67BE7271D4A82B252937F176FB3E026948E5F107BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

既にファクトチェック済みのデマです。 https://note.com/osamu_iga/n/n76735f6e16ca?sub_rt=share_pw |@osamu_iga 流産率80%超というデマは、以下の論文の数値を誤読して生み出したもの。 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983 105446例の妊娠、内13160例の自然流産を用いて、流産前28日間のmRNAワクチン接種を、対照群(妊娠継続中)と比較。流産と28日以内の接種歴に関連なし。調整オッズ比 1.02; 95% CI 0.96-1.08|米国 Spontaneous Abortion Following COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784193?utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=content-shareicons&utm_content=article_engagement&utm_medium=social&utm_term=081023

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714688532877574263
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2BE3D28A19E47F0FC3E2BC67BE7271D4A82B252937F176FB3E026948E5F107BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1699231099010
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17146885328775742632BE3D28A19E47F0FC3E2BC67BE7271D4A82B252937F176FB3E026948E5F107BC