Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-22 02:27:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BB3141FA1362FB202C09544B8B6F7072438402D48710FBF810B60FD6D657B44B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Proposed note is misleading. 1) Findings have been replicated on unexpired vials with clear chain of custody by other scientists 2) The risk concerns DNA, not mRNA, integration, and is legitimate. Quote from The Spectator article is accurate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714682355804188967
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BB3141FA1362FB202C09544B8B6F7072438402D48710FBF810B60FD6D657B44B
  • createdAtMillis - 1697941638109
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714682355804188967BB3141FA1362FB202C09544B8B6F7072438402D48710FBF810B60FD6D657B44B