Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-24 12:15:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A367E96FF4016481FAD3FBCE2BFD26D3FD865C4524340CE84D2069F22EFE59CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Proposed note is misleading. 1) Findings have been replicated on unexpired vials with clear chain of custody by other scientists 2) The risk concerns DNA, not mRNA, integration, and is legitimate. Quote from The Spectator article is accurate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714682355804188967
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A367E96FF4016481FAD3FBCE2BFD26D3FD865C4524340CE84D2069F22EFE59CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1698149739736
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714682355804188967A367E96FF4016481FAD3FBCE2BFD26D3FD865C4524340CE84D2069F22EFE59CE