Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-18 15:48:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B71AFEA15DC3765D7D486CD521AAF17AE29F82E7C294ECDC695EDF3262FAD31B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The New York Post is well established to have a reckless disregard for fact checking. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_312#RFC:_New_York_Post_(nypost.com)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714626149408469357
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B71AFEA15DC3765D7D486CD521AAF17AE29F82E7C294ECDC695EDF3262FAD31B
  • createdAtMillis - 1697644088858
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714626149408469357B71AFEA15DC3765D7D486CD521AAF17AE29F82E7C294ECDC695EDF3262FAD31B