Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-18 14:55:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 06AF159AA683D6375DA78E81964417DD941AC10F2209E6499BE2A4F78B52218D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the sources provided by the opposing notes don’t show the tweet is misleading. One shows cherry-picked examples and the other can’t be taken seriously. The notes are the ones that are misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714528402399756552
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 06AF159AA683D6375DA78E81964417DD941AC10F2209E6499BE2A4F78B52218D
  • createdAtMillis - 1697640935360
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171452840239975655206AF159AA683D6375DA78E81964417DD941AC10F2209E6499BE2A4F78B52218D