Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-17 22:45:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B230B42C143D6A41F9CAE5FB746497ABFEC38C21497C19E21D597609DDBBE982
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Top note is all over the place: Simultaneously argues the vials were expired (i.e., known) but were also of unknown origin. The expiration has no bearing on the presence of DNA in the vial. The DNA integration discussion is about the presence of SV40, not the mRNA itself.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714376036572643581
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B230B42C143D6A41F9CAE5FB746497ABFEC38C21497C19E21D597609DDBBE982
  • createdAtMillis - 1697582759086
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714376036572643581B230B42C143D6A41F9CAE5FB746497ABFEC38C21497C19E21D597609DDBBE982