Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 02:14:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4D7AFC438D1BDECF9AD2DFE374A5E1B7F6A1A2ED7FBD81443A023C2AEBFB7F2D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Top note is all over the place: Simultaneously argues the vials were expired (i.e., known) but were also of unknown origin. The expiration has no bearing on the presence of DNA in the vial. The DNA integration discussion is about the presence of SV40, not the mRNA itself.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714376036572643581
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4D7AFC438D1BDECF9AD2DFE374A5E1B7F6A1A2ED7FBD81443A023C2AEBFB7F2D
  • createdAtMillis - 1697681688601
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17143760365726435814D7AFC438D1BDECF9AD2DFE374A5E1B7F6A1A2ED7FBD81443A023C2AEBFB7F2D