Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-18 07:00:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 264A326797F6260B57D5CC611CC2008C2312831B81E5EB466241B2B93354E849
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Top note is all over the place: Simultaneously argues the vials were expired (i.e., known) but were also of unknown origin. The expiration has no bearing on the presence of DNA in the vial. The DNA integration discussion is about the presence of SV40, not the mRNA itself.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714376036572643581
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 264A326797F6260B57D5CC611CC2008C2312831B81E5EB466241B2B93354E849
  • createdAtMillis - 1697612427768
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714376036572643581264A326797F6260B57D5CC611CC2008C2312831B81E5EB466241B2B93354E849