Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-18 01:47:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D91D08531C90F6C441A66DCBB9F880C3FE9F6D393E027F208F4E2EEAD3C4E65A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Reuters and WSJ HAVE NOT confirmed anything. The articles used as reference for the suggested note do not support the claim.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714375680585056742
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D91D08531C90F6C441A66DCBB9F880C3FE9F6D393E027F208F4E2EEAD3C4E65A
  • createdAtMillis - 1697593671100
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714375680585056742D91D08531C90F6C441A66DCBB9F880C3FE9F6D393E027F208F4E2EEAD3C4E65A