Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-17 21:28:38 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C9B3A2F385D0E8CE0C61480BD6C7FFE5A9BF2473C523FA3DD4651D50A6FB00A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Reuters and WSJ HAVE NOT confirmed anything. The articles used as reference for the suggested note do not support the claim.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714375680585056742
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C9B3A2F385D0E8CE0C61480BD6C7FFE5A9BF2473C523FA3DD4651D50A6FB00A
  • createdAtMillis - 1697578118610
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17143756805850567424C9B3A2F385D0E8CE0C61480BD6C7FFE5A9BF2473C523FA3DD4651D50A6FB00A