Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-17 20:29:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17FFA9E0E5FEC71C73D16D5EB4E5C111033C94535DAC51E11D0E262EDD2C1574
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Reuters and WSJ HAVE NOT confirmed anything. The articles used as reference for the suggested note do not support the claim.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714375680585056742
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17FFA9E0E5FEC71C73D16D5EB4E5C111033C94535DAC51E11D0E262EDD2C1574
  • createdAtMillis - 1697574572517
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171437568058505674217FFA9E0E5FEC71C73D16D5EB4E5C111033C94535DAC51E11D0E262EDD2C1574