Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-18 08:59:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AE3A610EA36E6182BE90174906DF05C88EAFB63BD5CE8B31C444AFA0DA695297
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN La note proposée est de la propagande d’extrême-droite. Lugan n’est pas considéré comme un historien sérieux. Il existe des articles universitaires expliquant pourquoi c’est un révisionniste sur les questions de colonisation. https://journals.openedition.org/chrhc/1273?lang=en

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714368913247457437
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AE3A610EA36E6182BE90174906DF05C88EAFB63BD5CE8B31C444AFA0DA695297
  • createdAtMillis - 1697619553953
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714368913247457437AE3A610EA36E6182BE90174906DF05C88EAFB63BD5CE8B31C444AFA0DA695297