Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-17 20:52:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0B3CDC96029BF9F57C6B75DE47FBB3D7885D89B83DB77AFD750B9E2519DD8C6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN La note proposée est de la propagande d’extrême-droite. Lugan n’est pas considéré comme un historien sérieux. Il existe des articles universitaires expliquant pourquoi c’est un révisionniste sur les questions de colonisation. https://journals.openedition.org/chrhc/1273?lang=en

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714368913247457437
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0B3CDC96029BF9F57C6B75DE47FBB3D7885D89B83DB77AFD750B9E2519DD8C6
  • createdAtMillis - 1697575970329
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714368913247457437A0B3CDC96029BF9F57C6B75DE47FBB3D7885D89B83DB77AFD750B9E2519DD8C6