Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-17 15:40:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D17263729BE465C5886B3B3DAB9D870F2F79C0ECC415F03E2D4D92DB298FD9B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Le post n’est pas trompeur. Certains guillemets auraient pu effectivement être amendés de crochets car les termes ont parfois été recontextualisés. Mais ils représentent bien les propos tenus par la députée et ne les déforment pas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714226565444161558
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D17263729BE465C5886B3B3DAB9D870F2F79C0ECC415F03E2D4D92DB298FD9B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1697557241271
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714226565444161558D17263729BE465C5886B3B3DAB9D870F2F79C0ECC415F03E2D4D92DB298FD9B9