Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-17 17:53:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AE5B1B9D32DC41DFF63A72D5B0241F24709D306C0DA8CF6DF879097A9181252F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Le post n’est pas trompeur. Certains guillemets auraient pu effectivement être amendés de crochets car les termes ont parfois été recontextualisés. Mais ils représentent bien les propos tenus par la députée et ne les déforment pas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714226565444161558
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AE5B1B9D32DC41DFF63A72D5B0241F24709D306C0DA8CF6DF879097A9181252F
  • createdAtMillis - 1697565238096
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714226565444161558AE5B1B9D32DC41DFF63A72D5B0241F24709D306C0DA8CF6DF879097A9181252F