Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-17 12:31:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A408C4AF7DE0883099A902671D6D9DA487C912944F4043A5A898B208E08BF938
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Le post n’est pas trompeur. Certains guillemets auraient pu effectivement être amendés de crochets car les termes ont parfois été recontextualisés. Mais ils représentent bien les propos tenus par la députée et ne les déforment pas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714226565444161558
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A408C4AF7DE0883099A902671D6D9DA487C912944F4043A5A898B208E08BF938
  • createdAtMillis - 1697545909013
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714226565444161558A408C4AF7DE0883099A902671D6D9DA487C912944F4043A5A898B208E08BF938