Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-17 12:56:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 65A6D6B4435A4F13783FCABC30E952F8DE7E0A1A8F8AE504E0BB3D54B9657FFC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Le post n’est pas trompeur. Certains guillemets auraient pu effectivement être amendés de crochets car les termes ont parfois été recontextualisés. Mais ils représentent bien les propos tenus par la députée et ne les déforment pas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714226565444161558
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 65A6D6B4435A4F13783FCABC30E952F8DE7E0A1A8F8AE504E0BB3D54B9657FFC
  • createdAtMillis - 1697547419488
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171422656544416155865A6D6B4435A4F13783FCABC30E952F8DE7E0A1A8F8AE504E0BB3D54B9657FFC